I believe tomorrow we get TIC data. Showing how much US sovereign debt is being held by Japan & China, et al. Albeit is a lagging indicator from March.
Tihomir, this is the clearest framing of the current three-way divergence I have read anywhere.
The Japan repatriation point is the one that hits me. The structural bid for US Treasuries and European long-duration paper from Japanese institutional investors has been one of the most reliable and least discussed features of the global bond market for a decade. At 4% on a 30-year JGB that bid is not disappearing overnight but the incentive structure has genuinely shifted and when it fully materializes the selling pressure arrives into a market that is already under stress from domestic factors.
The Warsh confirmation timing is remarkable. His first week opens with the bond market having already made the policy decision for him. That is not a position any incoming Fed Chair wants to inherit — the appearance of being led by the market rather than leading it undermines credibility before a single speech is delivered.
The narrow path you identify is exactly right. Needing all seven conditions simultaneously is not analysis of risk. It is description of fragility.
The three-signal methodology I use identifies institutional repositioning before the narrative arrives. What happened Friday in the bond market was not a surprise to anyone reading the tape carefully. The volume and the directionality were already there.
The divergence you describe will resolve. It always does.
The only question worth asking right now is which side of that resolution you are positioned on before it happens.
I believe tomorrow we get TIC data. Showing how much US sovereign debt is being held by Japan & China, et al. Albeit is a lagging indicator from March.
Tihomir, this is the clearest framing of the current three-way divergence I have read anywhere.
The Japan repatriation point is the one that hits me. The structural bid for US Treasuries and European long-duration paper from Japanese institutional investors has been one of the most reliable and least discussed features of the global bond market for a decade. At 4% on a 30-year JGB that bid is not disappearing overnight but the incentive structure has genuinely shifted and when it fully materializes the selling pressure arrives into a market that is already under stress from domestic factors.
The Warsh confirmation timing is remarkable. His first week opens with the bond market having already made the policy decision for him. That is not a position any incoming Fed Chair wants to inherit — the appearance of being led by the market rather than leading it undermines credibility before a single speech is delivered.
The narrow path you identify is exactly right. Needing all seven conditions simultaneously is not analysis of risk. It is description of fragility.
The three-signal methodology I use identifies institutional repositioning before the narrative arrives. What happened Friday in the bond market was not a surprise to anyone reading the tape carefully. The volume and the directionality were already there.
The divergence you describe will resolve. It always does.
The only question worth asking right now is which side of that resolution you are positioned on before it happens.
Trying to grow this Substack slowly — please do consider subscribing it means a lot for me✨